http://community.warplanes.com/2008/02/17/contracts-for-zumwalt-class-destroyers-awarded/ An online aeronautics community Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:32:02 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://community.warplanes.com/2008/02/17/contracts-for-zumwalt-class-destroyers-awarded/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Gregory M. Chin Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:56:43 +0000 http://community.warplanes.com/2008/02/17/contracts-for-zumwalt-class-destroyers-awarded/#comment-96 I agree,it's just ugly! But this angular stealth-hull design shape, should make it possible for Bath Iron Works to assemble the full hull of a Zumwalt DDG 1000 ship, in just one month. Outfitting it will take longer. It looks unsinkable. I think the word "littorals" is a clumsy-sounding foreign word. We need to change that word to "shallows" or "shoal zones". Sounds better. I agree,it’s just ugly! But this angular stealth-hull design shape, should make it possible for Bath Iron Works to assemble the full hull of a Zumwalt DDG 1000 ship, in just one month. Outfitting it will take longer. It looks unsinkable.
I think the word “littorals” is a clumsy-sounding foreign word. We need to change that word to “shallows” or “shoal zones”. Sounds better.

]]> http://community.warplanes.com/2008/02/17/contracts-for-zumwalt-class-destroyers-awarded/comment-page-1/#comment-94 John L. Marty Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:01:04 +0000 http://community.warplanes.com/2008/02/17/contracts-for-zumwalt-class-destroyers-awarded/#comment-94 Thats the ugliest shik I've ever seen. Looks like we've gone back to the civil war-the Monitor-or a least turn of century, with the "reverse bow". For 2.8 billion couldn't we get a decent looking ship insted of this nautical monstrosity? Thats the ugliest shik I’ve ever seen. Looks like we’ve gone back to the civil war-the Monitor-or a least turn of century, with the “reverse bow”. For 2.8 billion couldn’t we get a decent looking ship insted of this nautical monstrosity?

]]>